7 comments:

pds said...

Can't wait to hear this! Thanks for posting Brian!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:25:00 AM GMT

Russell said...

Interesting Debate!

I was really impressed with Khalil's attitude throughout the debate. However, I wasn't so impressed with his arguments for Islam. I am constantly hearing verses from the Qur'an that seem to contradict each other. That was made even more obvious throughout this debate.

Anyway, thanks for posting this Brian! I really enjoyed it. For anyone interested, The unbelievable podcast is going to have Jay Smith on this week's show. I think he's debating someone on the idea that Jesus was replaced on the cross by someone else.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:35:00 PM GMT

8violets said...

Thank you, Brian!

Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:33:00 AM GMT

Haecceitas said...

Jay Smith is good and he definitely won this debate. Please consider interviewing David Wood or Nabeel Qureshi. I think David will be the clear #1 Christian debater against Islam once he hits the peak of his career (and some would grant him that title even now).

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 6:14:00 PM GMT+01:00

Anonymous said...

Haecceitas,

What about Dr. James White?

www.aomin.org

Wednesday, March 30, 2011 6:30:00 AM GMT+01:00

Haecceitas said...

Anonymous,

White is good when dealing when dealing with Muslim objections to Christianity but Wood has a more thorough knowledge of the Islamic literature and such. If White keeps his focus on Islam, he may eventually emerge as the clear #1. At this point I would rank Wood, White and Smith as more or less equal contenders for the title.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:50:00 AM GMT+01:00

Neverrepayevilwithevil said...

White, Wood and Smith are all excellent apologetics.They are all good in defence of the Christian faith. Khalil is obviously trying to use semantics. There is no substance to his argument.

Saturday, November 26, 2011 2:02:00 PM GMT