"Some have said that the laws of nature are simply accidental results of the way the universe cooled after the big bang. But, as Rees has pointed out, even such accidents can be regarded as secondary manifestations of deeper laws governing the ensemble of universes. Again, even the evolution of the laws of nature and changes to the constants follow certain laws. 'We’re still left with the question of how these "deeper" laws originated. No matter how far you push back the properties of the universe as somehow "emergent," their very emergence has to follow certain prior laws.'
1 So multiverse or not, we still have to come to terms with the origin of the laws of nature. And the only viable explanation here is the divine Mind.”
—Antony Flew
(There is a God
, pp. 121-122.)
1. Martin Rees, “Exploring Our Universe and Others,” in The Frontiers of Space (New York: Scientific American, 2000), 87.
1 comments:
Great quote there. The *philosophical* multiverse really doesn't help the atheist's way around a designer. It's either down the path of an infinite regression of universes (to illogically sidestep the uncaused cause e. g. God) or just accept that all the laws of the universe have a law giver.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.